According to one tabloid, concerns arising over every British family reportedly having to pay an extra £666 into the EU pot are theological rather than economical in nature: 666 is the number of the Beast, the Antichrist heralding the end of the world as we know it.
666, taken from the Book of Revelation, chapter 13, has been popularised many times over, as in blockbuster movie The Omen, by heavy metal band Iron Maiden and even Sir Andrew’s Phantom of the Opera.
666 has also previously been applied to historic figures as diverse as Nero, Ronald Reagan and Pope John Paul II.
666 - the ever popular three digits for doomsday countdowns.
It looks as though all previous interpretations of the ominous number were wrong. So what about the latest one: Brussels in the hands of the Antichrist? Depending on your political persuasion, you may find this more or less hard to believe. But even the staunchest UKIP voter will start having their doubts, once they face up to the biblical facts.
At the end of the day, it all boils down to good hermeneutics (interpretation) and exegesis (text analysis); it’s all about making good sense of the Bible. And we don’t need to be New Testament scholars to notice the obvious:
For one, the biblical number relates to a person, not an amount of money or a pan-European organisation.
Moreover, the author of Revelation was addressing the church of his day. Christians were being persecuted for their faith. They desperately needed a grand vision of God, a reminder of his ultimate victory over the forces of evil. There’s something distinctly pastoral about John’s message, which was first and foremost addressed to his suffering brothers and sisters in Christ. One way or another, most scholars believe he referred to one or more of the Roman Emperors.
Thirdly, a scrap of manuscript was found a few years ago, which turned out to be the oldest copy of Revelation 13 discovered to date. And, guess what, the number of the Beast was not 666, but 616! Scholarly opinion is divided, but 616 may have been the number in John’s original manuscript.
Most importantly, church history shows that trying to be too specific about Bible passages that are unclear can get us into all sorts of difficulties. It’s safer to stick with the things that are easy to grasp in comparison; such as the words of warning for casual Christians in Revelation chapters 2 and 3; or the grand portrayal of divine justice and redemption in Revelation 21 – a book that is ultimately less concerned with cryptic doomsday symbols than the clear message of a God who, one day, will dry all tears and make all things new.
If you want to learn more about making good sense of the Bible for yourself, you might like h+, a new course in biblical interpretation for everyone who wants to gain a better understanding of the Bible. Visit hplus.org.uk for more info






